Prince Harry didn't visit King Charles despite pair being just miles apart during UK visit

did not see his dad on Tuesday - despite being just miles away.

in person for 14 months, it is believed. Harry, though, arrived at London Heathrow while . His 40-year-old son was in London for a hearing at Royal Courts of Justice, where .

It has previously been reported the monarch is "frustrated" at Harry’s long-running legal fight and worries his son wants to lobby him in the "mistaken belief that the King has control over his security".

And, Harry waved as he entered the central London court on Tuesday morning, but did not speak to reporters gathered outside. He wore a dark suit with a blue patterned tie and walking through Bell Yard, he did not reply as a reporter asked, "Did you speak to your dad?"

READ MORE:

Since flying out to Rome, Charles and Camilla, Queen Consort, have of the city's historic Colosseum, and . Earlier, their ceremonial welcome included a joint display by the Red Arrows and Italian counterparts Frecce Tricolori.

They also walked up 44 steps to place a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. The couple were greeted with rousing cheers at the Colosseum and hosted a reception. They celebrate their 20th wedding anniversary in the city on Wednesday with a string of further engagements.

But Harry, meanwhile, sat in a packed courtroom, occasionally taking notes as proceedings got underway. The Court of Appeal heard the duke has been "singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment" but the Home Office, which has legal responsibility for the committee's decisions, is opposing the appeal. Its lawyers previously told the High Court decisions were taken on a "case-by-case" basis.

The Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) had previously decided . Retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane ruled last year Ravec's decision, taken in early 2020 after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex quit as senior working royals, was lawful.

However, speaking on Tuesday, Shaheed Fatima KC, for the duke, said: "When Ravec made its February 2020 decision about the appellant's protective security, it did not apply its own terms of reference to that decision-making process." The hearing before Sir Geoffrey Vos, Lord Justice Bean, and Lord Justice Edis is due to conclude on Wednesday with a decision expected in writing at a later date.