The late Queen would have been "horrified" by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's criticism of , a royal expert has said. The Duchess of Sussex was appointed as vice-president of the Commonwealth Trust in March 2019, while her husband was president, with the hope the couple would breathe fresh life into the voluntary association of 56 nations - most of which were once part of the British Empire.
At the time, Meghan even claimed her work would "highlight the trust's partnerships with young people across , and in particular its work supporting women and girls". But the couple left the trust when they stepped down as working royals in 2020 - and when they aired their Netflix docuseries in December 2022, the pair hired experts .
The Daily Mail's diary editor Richard Eden said: "It's almost lucky that isn't alive to see this because the Commonwealth was so central to her and bringing people together. It's a voluntary organisation whereas [in the documentary], it's dismissed as this colonial body used for Britain to extract money and resources from the rest of the world. She would have been horrified."
In the documentary, academic Afua Hirsch called "Empire 2.0" while author Kehinde Andrews claimed "nothing has changed" from the UK's colonial past, apart from the Royal Family's "better PR".
THIS LIVE BLOG IS NOW CLOSED. ALL UPDATES CAN BE OR BELOW.
You may also like
National Herald case: 'Congress being troubled unnecessarily,' Mallikarjun Kharge accuses BJP of 'working against law'
Blue Origin door is 'definite proof' Katy Perry space tour was fake, sceptics claim
'I'm an Antiques Roadshow star and scary rule means we can never touch guests' items'
M25 traffic: Chaos on busy UK motorway after fire rips through tunnel
Marco Rubio, Steve Witkoff head to Paris for high-stakes Ukraine war talks