Former Las Vegas Raiders head coach Jon Gruden will get a high-level review in Nevada's Supreme Court of his lawsuit regarding leaked emails before he resigned as the Raiders' head coach last year. While all seven justices voted unanimously to grant the request to rehear the case without oral arguments, a decision from May 14 by a prior panel that remained in place 2-1 to dismiss it has now been reversed.
Judicial Review and Prior Judgment
The Supreme Court made judgment after a panel of justices denied Gruden's legal team's motion for reconsideration of dismissal that occurred on July 1. According to the judgment issued by that earlier panel, it held that the NFL can always have the case migrate to arbitration, which could be presided over by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, who happens to be one of the defendants in the complaint. Two justices argue that Gruden had notice of the arbitration practices when he signed with the Raiders; however, a dissenting justice is concerned over the factor of fairness as Goodell sits in arbitration.
Also Read - How NFL Players Invest
Intentional Leak Allegations
He claims that Goodell and the league forced the Raiders to fire him when they posted the racist, sexist and homophobic slurs he made as an ESPN analyst in the emails. Gruden resigned from the Raiders last November. Previously, the judge had intimated that a jury could decide whether the league's selective leaking of Gruden's emails was a "specific intent" to smash his career.
Career Damage and Damages ClaimedGruden was the head coach when the Raiders moved from Oakland to Las Vegas in 2020 and has career damage and lost endorsement deals actionable for monetary damages against the defendants given these emails were published in Wall Street Journal and New York Times. But before that, Gruden had yet another glorious coaching career and including winning the Super Bowl in the year 2003 when with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and also an analyst stint on TV before returning to Raiders in 2018.
Also Read - Record Breaking Viewership of NFL
Judicial Review and Prior Judgment
The Supreme Court made judgment after a panel of justices denied Gruden's legal team's motion for reconsideration of dismissal that occurred on July 1. According to the judgment issued by that earlier panel, it held that the NFL can always have the case migrate to arbitration, which could be presided over by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, who happens to be one of the defendants in the complaint. Two justices argue that Gruden had notice of the arbitration practices when he signed with the Raiders; however, a dissenting justice is concerned over the factor of fairness as Goodell sits in arbitration.
Also Read - How NFL Players Invest
Nevada high court to review decision in ex-Raiders coach Jon Gruden's lawsuit over NFL emails https://t.co/JnlRxvec0M
— WGN Radio Sports (@WGNRadioSports) October 11, 2024
Intentional Leak Allegations
He claims that Goodell and the league forced the Raiders to fire him when they posted the racist, sexist and homophobic slurs he made as an ESPN analyst in the emails. Gruden resigned from the Raiders last November. Previously, the judge had intimated that a jury could decide whether the league's selective leaking of Gruden's emails was a "specific intent" to smash his career.
Career Damage and Damages ClaimedGruden was the head coach when the Raiders moved from Oakland to Las Vegas in 2020 and has career damage and lost endorsement deals actionable for monetary damages against the defendants given these emails were published in Wall Street Journal and New York Times. But before that, Gruden had yet another glorious coaching career and including winning the Super Bowl in the year 2003 when with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and also an analyst stint on TV before returning to Raiders in 2018.
Also Read - Record Breaking Viewership of NFL
You may also like
Aviation minister on flight bomb hoaxes: One minor arrested, others responsible to be duly prosecuted
"Our good work is our response to critics": Karnataka Deputy CM Shivakumar
Sophie Wessex just wore 'elegant' Monica Vinader bracelet and it makes an 'excellent gift'
Maya Jama slams rumours about Stormzy split as he moves on with Victoria Monet
Rise in MSP of Rabi crops to make farmers' lives easier: PM Modi
UP: 2 Bajrang Dal leaders booked over 'derogatory' remarks on Prophet Mohammed
17-year-old held over bomb threats to 19 flights in 3 days
Capital India Finance sells housing finance subsidiary to firm backed by former HDFC employees for Rs 267 crore
MAFS star takes aim at 'cheating ex groom' in cryptic post about 'weak men'
PM Modi to join Abhidhamma Divas & Pali recognition celebrations on Oct 17
Chhattisgarh to begin paddy procurement from Nov 14, launches measures to curb illegal liquor sales
Nagaland cabinet to soon meet PM, Shah, Himanta to resolve border dispute with Assam: Dy CM
Seven of a family killed as car falls into canal in Telangana
Meghan Markle's missing engagement ring more significant than Kate's because...
CM sitting here, says Fadnavis at Mahayuti presser, asks MVA to declare its leader
Offbeat: Inspiring Story of Retired-SBI-Employee Cracking NEET at 64 to Achieve His Dream of Doctor!
Priyanka Chopra To Launch Global Makeup Brand 'Max Factor' In India
The myth of Lawrence Bishnoi: Why Canadian police is wrong
Festive Offer Alert: BMW G 310 R and G 310 GS unveiled with special benefits
King Charles' charity gets major rebrand to be 'relevant to young people'