NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre and the Election Commission (EC) on a petition challenging the practice of political parties promising freebies during election campaigns.
A bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, along with Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, issued notices to the government and the poll panel regarding a petition filed by Bengaluru resident Shashank J Sreedhara.
The petition, submitted by advocate Srinivasan, calls for the EC to take steps to prevent political parties from offering freebies during the pre-election period. It argues that the unregulated promise of freebies imposes a financial burden on the public exchequer and lacks any mechanism to ensure that pre-election promises are fulfilled after votes are secured. This petition has been linked with other similar pleas.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear petitions opposing the promise of election freebies after senior advocate Vijay Hansaria, representing lawyer and public interest litigant Ashwini Upadhyay, called for an urgent hearing.
Upadhyay's plea calls for a total ban on populist measures used to gain political favor, arguing that such promises violate the Constitution. It also requests the EC to implement deterrent measures to curb this practice. According to the plea, offering irrational freebies before elections unfairly influences voters, disrupts a level playing field, and compromises the integrity of the electoral process.
The petition further contends that the trend of political parties offering freebies with electoral gains in mind poses a threat to democratic values and undermines the spirit of the Constitution. It equates this practice with bribery, arguing that it is used to retain power at the expense of the public exchequer, which could harm democratic principles.
The petition also seeks a directive for the EC to amend the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order 1968, adding a condition that prohibits political parties from promising or distributing irrational freebies from public funds during the election period. Additionally, it asks the court to declare that the promise or distribution of private goods or services not intended for public purposes violates several articles of the Constitution, including Article 14.
A bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, along with Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, issued notices to the government and the poll panel regarding a petition filed by Bengaluru resident Shashank J Sreedhara.
The petition, submitted by advocate Srinivasan, calls for the EC to take steps to prevent political parties from offering freebies during the pre-election period. It argues that the unregulated promise of freebies imposes a financial burden on the public exchequer and lacks any mechanism to ensure that pre-election promises are fulfilled after votes are secured. This petition has been linked with other similar pleas.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear petitions opposing the promise of election freebies after senior advocate Vijay Hansaria, representing lawyer and public interest litigant Ashwini Upadhyay, called for an urgent hearing.
Upadhyay's plea calls for a total ban on populist measures used to gain political favor, arguing that such promises violate the Constitution. It also requests the EC to implement deterrent measures to curb this practice. According to the plea, offering irrational freebies before elections unfairly influences voters, disrupts a level playing field, and compromises the integrity of the electoral process.
The petition further contends that the trend of political parties offering freebies with electoral gains in mind poses a threat to democratic values and undermines the spirit of the Constitution. It equates this practice with bribery, arguing that it is used to retain power at the expense of the public exchequer, which could harm democratic principles.
The petition also seeks a directive for the EC to amend the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order 1968, adding a condition that prohibits political parties from promising or distributing irrational freebies from public funds during the election period. Additionally, it asks the court to declare that the promise or distribution of private goods or services not intended for public purposes violates several articles of the Constitution, including Article 14.
You may also like
India not cooperating with Canada on Nijjar investigations: US
Omar Abdullah set to begin second stint as J-K CM
From being MP to serving as Union MoS, Omar Abdullah set to take oath today as Chief Minister of J-K
Trump vs Harris: Betting market tells different story from polls
This is What the Comet Visiting Our Solar System After 80,000 Years Looks Like
Chennai Rain Disrupts Train Services: SR Announces Several Changes In Operations Today-Complete Details
'I was at spin class ... ': Doug Emhoff recalls when Kamala Harris told him Biden was dropping out
'No one should go to jail for smoking weed': Harris promises to legalise recreational marijuana
Canada's targeting of envoy Verma 'absurd', says official
59 Cleantech Startups Working Towards Making India's Future Cleaner & Greener
What happens when you eat sesame seeds and jaggery together?
Audacity Unmatched: The Con Artist Who Sold the Taj Mahal – Thrice
5 Best CNG Cars Under Rs 10 Lakh - Punch, Glanza, Exter
'Possess, control, impregnate her': Olivia Nuzzi's ex-fiancé claims RFK jr manipulated her
Baba Siddique Murder: Attackers Who Shot NCP Leader Were Suspected To Be Under Influence Of Marijuana; Drug Packet Found At Rented House In Kurla
Brits warned as Spain passes 'royal decree' in holiday crackdown
Priyanka Chopra's 'Bollywood Dreams Come True' In Switzerland. Don't Miss Sridevi Connect
Chennai On Red Alert Today: Depression Expected To Make Landfall Near City On October 17
Lifetime ISA warning as area with the most savers can't even use the funds
Victoria's Secret Fashion Show Returns After 6-Year Hiatus; Gigi Hadid Opens the Runway